Thalia said:
Fab news Akeeyu, but I remember sam was VERY not keen on twins, and you weren't mad keen either. Is it the general uncertainty that's making this ok for now or are you in shock?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Issue One: It's true, Sam has never been enthusiastic about the idea of a multiple pregnancy. He looks at it as a greater risk to me, which it is, and this worries him.
A few weeks ago, Julie wrote a post about decision making and persuasion, and I left this comment:
I must admit that I usually have an easier time making these decisions than Sam. In my case, the absolute worst possible scenario is: I die. In Sam's case, the absolute worst possible scenario is: I die. This is clearly worse for him. Death is a finite experience, whereas being a surviving spouse is an Energizer Bunny version of Hell.
As the primary owner of the only uterus in the relationship, there are plenty of risks that I am willing to take, so the choices are easier for me. For Sam, it's different. It's harder. He also ultimately has much less control over the situation, since little to none of it is happening inside (or even remotely near) his body. Furthermore, he has a front row seat to any and all suffering and gets the added bonus of Having To Be The Strong One.
Poor bastard.
After watching my parents experience my father's death, I believe that it is more painful to survive the death of a loved one than to be the one doing the dying, so I respect that in some situations, it is harder to be Sam than it is to be me. It's easier to suffer than to witness the suffering of someone dear to you.
This, of course, leads directly to my reservations about multiple gestation. Issue Two: The risk that keeps me up at night isn't mine. No matter how you slice it, mortality rates for twins and high order multiples are statistically quite a bit higher than single pregnancies. While I am comfortable with taking all kinds of dumbass risks with my own health and life (off the top of my head, 'cycling more than once given my risk for developing OHSS' comes to mind), I am very uncomfortable assigning those risks to a third party or parties.
Because Sam and I discuss the risks and our feelings about them (ad nauseam), we have been accused of being negative about twins. Look, I'm not going to lie to you. It drives me crazy when I see women and couples online trying to 'maximize their chances of having twins or triplets'. I once saw a poster on IVFC trying to figure out the best way to (deliberately) get their gestational surrogate pregnant with triplets, and my fucking head almost exploded. I firmly believe that the goal of REs and people trying to conceive (through traditional means or ART) should be to attain the healthiest possible pregnancy/gestation/baby, and statistically speaking, singletons give the best odds for this outcome.
Does this mean that I think all twins are sickly or that you're an asshole if you have/had twins or high order multiples? No, of course not. It's a known risk of ART, and sometimes things just happen. Believe me, I understand that. My irritation is reserved for intent, not outcome, so if you went into a stimmed IUI with a specific goal of conceiving quintuplets "because HOMs are, like, sooo cute!" (without a whit of concern for the reality of the situation), then okay, fine, I think you're kind of a dick, but everyone else, I'm really not trying to get on your case or be all judgy. You and your families have my respect for the way you have dealt with the unique challenges of life, and I wish you all the best.
Issue Three: There is a metric assload of denial/uncertainty in the water supply at the Buttmansion abode. For those not familiar with the metric system, that would be a lot. This is my fourth pregnancy with nothing to show for it. I've been pregnant enough times that this whole early stage feels disturbingly familiar, but as it's never led to anything in the past, I have a hard time believing that it ever does, or at least for me. Around these parts, 'being pregnant' does not equal 'having a baby'. For me, seeing two gestational sacs on a five week ultrasound is supercool, but it does not automatically mean two babies in the end (or even one), so it's hard to get all that that wound up about the realities of a multiple gestation right at the moment.
Right now, none of this feels real.
I'm kind of reserving any potential freaking out and/or excitement for my eight week ultrasound, and possibly much later. No, that wasn't a typo. Yes, I just said "eight week ultrasound". No, the clinic isn't the one responsible for scheduling my first ultrasound that far out. I am. When I called to schedule what was supposed to be my seven week ultrasound, I discovered three things: One, that Dr. BrightEyes was really busy that week. Two, that I'd rather chow down on one of the dubious delicacies from the Steve, Don't Eat It! menu than allow someone other than Dr. BrightEyes to perform such an emotionally perilous exam. Three, I'm in no damn hurry.
I know that's wrong. I know that as an infertile, I am supposed to crave ultrasounds more than the accidental stars of Cops crave smack, but somehow I don't, or at least not right at the moment. I'm feeling a little wand shy right now. The issue I can't get around is that I had a perfectly normal six week ultrasound with Good Embryo. Longtime readers may recall that everything looked perfect and we even saw the heartbeat, and yet GE died a week later. GE died at seven weeks, making a six or seven week ultrasound seem entirely meaningless to me. At this early stage, there's not a goddamned thing anybody can do for Fitz-Hume and Millbarge no matter what they see on an ultrasound, so I'd rather just wait.
If we see two heartbeats on the eight week ultrasound, Sam and I will both be overjoyed. We both already love Fitz-Hume and Millbarge very very much (which I fully admit is a reckless and stupid sort of emotion to have this early, given our reproductive history). We will also be scared shitless.
If we see one heartbeat on the eight week ultrasound, we will undoubtedly grieve, but we will still be happy and grateful for what remains. We will also still be scared shitless. I went to my prenatal pre-screening at Evil Insurance Company, Inc. on Friday and discovered, much to my surprise, that they placed me squarely into the High Risk Pregnancy category without even taking into account the possibility of a multiple gestation. Between the repeated pregnancy loss, endometriosis, PCOS, history of infertility (I was a little surprised to see them classify this as a risk factor) and hypothyroid, apparently my uterus is not considered to be this year's hot vacation spot.
Issue Four: Still in shock? Fuck, yes.